Rationality Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Rationality - Term Paper utilisationThats why it is called foundationalist. It interprets knowledge according to onenesss personal foundations, how one is taught about things. These grassroots beliefs argon treated as self-justifying meaning to give voice that it does not posit any reason or explanation whatsoever in understanding the said belief. This is used to understand other things as these reasons are the basic principles of how the human mind works. The foundationalist approach to rationality then is a more than rigid social organization of what is and what is not without needing to explain things only or whether to think that something screwing be interpreted in more meanss than one. This is how it is different from the constructivist approach wherein this approach interprets rationality as something that can be viewed differently from one person to another, whether they are from the same or different cultures, or whether they had the same or different experiences. Its primer coat is upon ones own personal interpretations and while interpreting and explaining things, it moves on to create new explanations that further open new roads and opportunities of thought processes. The constructivist approach to rationality is a more flexible way of understanding things, as the term implies it constructs explanations rather than ground them as what foundationalist approach does.With this, I can say that rationality can be perceived some(prenominal) ways (although this still is a more constructivist approach). We can use grounded beliefs in interpreting different things that needs explanations, although there are some specific things that need to be interpreted depending on how one is raised upon it. Evidently, this shows that good reasons are evidently true depending on how we try to explain things.Classmate Todds interpretation of the foundationalist and constructivist approach to rationality allows us to see that both approaches can go hand-in-hand in understanding rationality. This is