'History and Description of a Subordinate Group Member Essay\r'

' passim the history of North America, there has been one ethnical group who has given up almost everything to the European settlers. Land, home, resources, and dignity were stolen from innate Americans. The long history of the American Indian is being written, even at once. more or less cardinal thousand years ago, the earliest ancestors of Native Americans migrated cross slipway the Bering Strait from Asia on pack ice (Hoerder, 2005). The macrocosm rose steadily, and by the time the first satisfying settlement of Europeans was established in the New World, Native Americans operated throughout the continent.\r\nIn the search for more farmland, European immigrants quickly pushed the native population out of their conventional homelands. This migration began the crowding of some other native bands, forcing eastern natives to pop off beyond the Ohio River, thus starting a serial publication of relocations for the Native Americans that continued through the next 2 centuries. Less than fifty years after the extirpate of the American Revolution, many of the tribes in the northeastern unite States sold their land under pressure from the newcomers. to begin with 1850, these natives migrated west of the Mississippi River.\r\nIf you traveled to Oklahoma today you would find the same bloodlines that once roamed the New England hills (â€Å"Indians” The ref’s Companion to American History, 1991). Wanting to live apart from the natives and expecting them to remain controlled, reservations were established, including an Indian Territory (est. 1825) in present-day Oklahoma. The Indian Removal function of 1830 was enacted to populate these newly established areas. President Jackson order the forced migration of Native Americans from multiple southeastern tribes.\r\nApproximately 4,000 Cherokee Indians perished in 1838-1839 on their 800-mile march, or during their succeeding internment. This tragical event has become known as the â€Å" hang b ack of Tears”. (American Indian Policy, 2002) Trying to â€Å"Americanize” instead of segregate the Indians, in 1887, Congress passed the Dawes Act, which broke up reservations and gave land to individual Indian families. The idea of the Dawes Act was to assimilate Indians by giving them land from which they could profit.\r\nWhat followed were laws, everyplace the next few decades, which dissolved tribal governments and pose Native Americans completely under the jurisdiction of U. S. laws (American Indian Policy, 2002). The reservation system is one distinctive facial gesture of the Native American culture that materialized from their relationship with other Americans. The United States has 310 reservations within its borders. The federal government owns 298 reservations and 12 belong to the states in which they are located. A agree of 437,431 Indians resided on reservations or trust lands. That is approximately 22 percent of the Native Americans defined by the 199 0 census (Shumway & Jackson, 1995). The United States has proven itself unreliable on its policies and treatment of Native Americans.\r\nThe government teeters between a policy of segregation, under which Indians are treated as a self-sustaining culture, and assimilation policies, which try to immix Indian and European cultures. The United States acknowledged Indian sovereignty and established treaties with them. Unlike foreign nations, Indians overlap the continent with the quickly growing nation who inevitable resources, and were quick to form treaties, giving Indians land rights and territorial sovereignty but repeatedly found ways to revoke those privileges.\r\n'