'The Korean War started in the aftermath of World War II\r'

'The Korean fight started in the after(prenominal)math of World War II.  When the great(p) War that ended all state of struggles resulted in the defeat of Japan, a new king arose in the Pan Asian area, the weirdie of USSR.  Stalin’s tight rein on the country and its quick and vicious initiation to superpower status caused Americans to veneration that the Soviet Empire would attempt to spread fabianism by means ofout the world.  Eastern Europe had already been engulfed and President Truman was weary of the possibility of the difference of Asia falling into the grasp of collectivism.\r\nTherefore in Korea, America made a dissent for res publica (Ridgeway, 15).  The fall in States called this policy â€Å" kiboshment”, to contain the spread of collectivism because it attempts to encroach on America’s philosophy of democracy (Ridgeway, 15).  The very policy of containment arose out of fear from Secretary of State Kissinger that the So viet sum of money’s eventual plan is to loom the politics of the Pan Asian union and eventually threaten the rest of Europe.\r\nThe Korean War rose out of these muckle as a encounter against socialism (Ridgeway, 15).  Northern Korea threatened Southern Korea by a series of hostile attacks, and after the South Korean Army with avail from the US decimated the Northern Alliance, China’s quick intercession quickly changed the tides of war.  Korea was non an isolated two nation battle; rather it delineated a political ideological struggle between westernization and communism (Ridgeway, 15).   China wanted to exert its nominal head following its own communist variety as chose Korea as the testing curtilage for its new army operations.  When Korea was finally scatter in half after suspensive battles, its role in history was endlessly full termed as the â€Å"Forgotten War”.\r\nVietnam occurred below similar circumstances.  The Soviet Union’s powers were at its peak during this time, having proved that they were at present a nuclear power; this is the prototypally time that these two nations met indirectly (Moise, 130).  Vietnam became the first study war in the have a bun in the oven nuclear weapons era and it was motivated by the continuance of the theory of containment.\r\nAlthough large amounts of promenade activity was already taking pose during the John F. Kennedy era, President Johnson’s term saw the escalation of troops and combat at bottom the region.  The North Koreans were constantly supplied via underground shipments from the Soviet Union and China, thus the war did non seem like it would end (Moise, 130).  The definitive withdraw of US troops during Nixon’s presidency represented the first major victory and break through with(predicate) for the communists in Asia.  As a result, the specter of the Cold War continued to loom over the world.\r\nThe Iraqi war pl aced the join States in a unique position.  Since September 11th, the war on terrorism is very often different from the war on communism in that there are no tangible enemies.  Following unsuccessful attacks on terrorism in Afghanistan, the target of Iraq represented President Bush’s strategy of First strike defense, or preemptive strike (Roberts, 23)  This theory contends that as Iraq has an intelligible hatred of the get together States and has shown in that retiring(a) to have harbored and still harbors weapons of mass destruction.\r\nDestroying it to begin with it could target the United States either through direct attack or through gartering terrorist cells (Roberts, 23),. This philosophy is very more than motivated by a matter of policies, among them was the previous attack on Iraq in Operation Desert Storm which badly weakened Saddam Hussein’s military power in the region.  However, since there was no eminent threat to the United States, there was no international crime syndicate as large as the ones during Korea and Vietnam (Roberts, 23).\r\nTherefore, the war on Iraq is viewed by many in the international society as whoreson and unsanctioned.  As such the political pressures from slightly the world are very untold negative.  Even in victory, the Iraqi war now seems to have bear consequences that has harmed the United State’s position in the world political circle.  The current negotiations with the United Nations to aid in the Iraqi motion has met with resistance as the world community repeatedly contends they will not help George Bush clean up the burst of his crime.  The political undercurrents of this war may acidulate negative much like the results of the Vietnam courage (Roberts, 23).\r\nRidgway, Matthew B. He Korean War. Boston: Da Capo Press, 1988.\r\nMoise, Edwin E. Tonkin Gulf and the Escalation of the Vietnam War. North\r\nCarolina: UNC Press , 1996. Roberts, Paul. The abate Of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World. Seattle:\r\nMariner Books, 2005.\r\n'