Gender and Our Judicial System Essay -- Law

The ambiguous language and aim of the constitution has allowed for numerous explanations of the law. thither have been several instances, where our limited perception and interpretation of the constitution has warranted flip due to cases that do not fit the ruling partys ideology of equality. In those cases, we amended our constitution and included light up phrasing to award rights to those takeed to subordination, so in going forward a clear distinction would not allow room for interpretations that perpetuated further discrimination. Over the fall of history, we have followed this path to incorporate our societies changing paradigm that was dissimilar to our excogitation fathers. Interestingly so, the rights they deemed as inalienable are the ones that have required a clear distinction in order for them to apply to all. The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a necessary requirement for women as well as others who are issue to sex-based discrimination. Although the rights of wo men are somewhat protected by the constitution, without the clear diction of the ERA, those who facial gesture this type of discrimination, are left in a precarious position. The exit of the ERA would necessitate pragmatic consequences in judicial equality, highlight the pervasiveness of advanced inequality, and enact change in societys paradigm of equality.The well-to-do interpretation of the notion of gender in our judicial system is subject to filtration through and through outdated ideologies, stereotypes, and gender bias. As the law currently stands, the interpretation of cases that involve gender or sexual discrimination are filtered through constitutional acts or amendments that only partially protect. An example of this partial protective covering would be the 14th amendment. T... ...122). Macmillan General Reference.Sexism in language. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.upou.edu.ph/gender/gender_fair.Lithwick, D. (2011, June 20). Class dismissed. Retrieved from http//ww w.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/ ordinance/2011/06/class_dismissed.htmlTerkel, A. (2011). Scalia Women dont have constitutional protection against discrimination. Huffington Post, Retrieved from http//www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/03/scalia-women-discrimination-constitution_n_803813.htmlCotter, D., Hermsen, J., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Informally create manuscript, University of North Carolina, North Carolina. Retrieved from http//www.bsos.umd.edu/socy/vanneman/papers/CotterHOV01.pdfWood, J. T. (2008). Gendered lives, communication, gender, and culture. (8th ed.). Wadsworth Pub Co.U.S. Const. amend. XIV, 1