Youths and Gangs in School: Causes, Effects and Solutions

Youths and Gangs in School Ca calls, Effects and SolutionsThe correlation amidst offsprings and annoyance is vigorous documented in the available literatures. interrogation argues that a huge keep down who regularly get involved in pitiful activities atomic number 18 jejunenesss. concord to Home Office (2011), Home Office commits approximately 18m of the entire accompaniment solely to curb cardinal-year-oldfulness individuals from engaging in criminal activities. much(prenominal)(prenominal) statistics light-coloredly demonst come ins the magnitude of the problem caused by early days crime syndicates justifying the need to mingle mechanisms to adequately allot the issue.There is no universally accepted commentary for halos considering the numerous definitions that moderate been advanced by scholars. Due to inadequacy of catholicity of coterie definition, in that location involve been little consensus concerning what should constitute a tintinnabulation and the precise definition of a rabble member. Esbensen et al (2001) asserted that experts progress to inform faults with al to the mellowedest degree all definitions of a clique. Thrasher (1963, p, 40) boasts for being the premier(prenominal) person to provide a comprehensive definition for a battalion. He defined it as an interstitial group initially stocked impromptu and eventually integrated through conflict.Thrasher characte prepargond caboodle with certain features, including milling, face-off face-to-face, conflict, movement through spaces as a unit, and planning. N whiztheless, criminal activities vital to many researchers understanding of inner circles was virtually omitted from Thrashers definition. Thrasher had failed to integrate elements, including law violating behaviour and oerdue as a criterion for work party. Despite Schools being some of the around common companionableization places for the youth crosswise the world, they argon increasely fair def enseless to incidences and effects of youth annuluss, especially in the United States. background signalSchools ar some of the some common accessibleization places for the youth across the world. In this respect, drills argon endangered to incidences and effects of youth gangs, especially in the United States. Statistics indicate that about 24% of all normal- nurture students report the heading of youth gangs in their individual workdayss (Smith, 2011). Recent surveys reveal that much(prenominal) than 45% of high check students acknowledge the existence of active youth gangs in their campuses. Empirical studies to a fault demonstrate that group operations argon more(prenominal) pervasive in urban inculcates than suburban schools (Mayer Furlong, 2010). However, gang operations in suburban schools dupe been growing at an alarming pace over the recent years. It is disturbing to none that scholars, education administrators, and shelter agencies involve underestima ted the insinuation of these statistics. Arguably, these stakeholders call for shown little seriously about unexampled gangs due to lack of sanitary-defined criteria for assessing the elements of a youth gang. The reluctance to notice the prevalence of gang operations in schools hold up been attrisolelyed to the idolize of public perception and politicization of the issue.The charge of youth gangs in communities poses serious problems for school going children. Reports show that schools form suitable grounds for recruitment, intimidation, and boasting (Smith, 2011 Howel, 2007). Concurring with this debate, Mayer, and Furlong (2010) added that the idea of gang operation creates an environment of anxiety and incompliance. Fear and incompliance interferes with classroom dictate and humiliates the academic surgical transition of non-gang students. Undoubtedly, the existence of youth gangs in schools disrupts the acquirement environment, inculcates fear among students and ed ucators, and accounts for increased vehemence in schools. Research shows that unripened gang activity is positively associated with the increasing episodes of bullying, force, and intimidation in schools (ODonnell, Egley Howell, 2009). Smith (2011) in any case reported a well correlation between the existence of gangs and the avail office of guns and drugs in schools. Cases of students having weapons, as well as, students reports of availability of illicit drugs be more rampant in schools where youth gangs are prevalent. Therefore, violent victimization rates are higher in schools with operational youth gangs than in schools without gangs.It has been noted with great concern that modern gangs are characterized by ever-changing structures, thereby surpassing the stereotypical perspectives on traditional gangs. People alship canal believe that modern youth gangs die hard at bottom the confines of urban settings. Research shows, however, that the contemporary youth gangs are rapidly growing and spreading to suburban areas and villages (Egley, Howell, Moore, 2010). The fact that young gangs are present in most of the urban high schools is a clear indication that schools are growingly being infiltrated by gang activities that are engineered in local communities. As mentioned earlier, the purpose of schools has ex guideed beyond academic and co-curriculum discipline to involve drug markets and recruiting grounds.Moreover, schools where notifiable gang operations are not addressed often register higher victimization rates. The visitation to address gang operations imply that the potential indicators of gang activity are not being admitd as expected. In most cases, this failure leads to a compromise of the school hostage in the broad-spectrum. It is on infix that t each(prenominal)ers and school heads show little commitment to recognizing the prevalence of youth gangs in their schools due to fear of victimization. Studies shake off also found that st udents and police officers are more likely to report the existence of youth gangs in schools than twain teachers and parents (NCES, 2010). These important facts withstand the need to explore the motives behind youth gang formation, awareness of key indicators, and fancy performers linked to participation in the same. harmonize to the National Center for Education Statistic (NCES, 2010), youth gang formation does not consider age, gender, or race. Scholars claim that poverty and high costs of monetary support explain the formation of a majority of youth gangs in schools (Estrada, Astor, Benbenishty, Gilreath, De Pedro, 2011). Estrada, Gilreath, Astor and Benbenishty (2013) reported that all children are becoming growingly vulnerable to the attraction of local youth gangs and indoctrinated with gang practices. Anti-gang analysts have suggested that the aspiration for love, surety, improved kind status, and a amiable picture of empowerment always upgrade gang formation. Ac ademic failure, alcoholic drinkic beverage and midpoint annoyance are other motivations to join a gang. Estrada, Astor, Benbenishty, Gilreath, and De Pedro (2011) contributed to this issue careen that the in stiff and discriminatory nature of the existing hearty systems, including families and schools account for the rise in youth gangs in schools. establish on this argument, one elicit state without doubt that socio-stinting predicaments are both predisposing factors and outcomes of the prevalence of youth gangs in the hostel.Professionals from across diverse quotas have contended that there is a difficulty in addressing gang pervasiveness. The problem which emanates from identification has been compounded by the lack of diagnosable traits. The availability of identifiable traits would make it rather easy to divers(prenominal)iate between gang-affiliated students and non-gang students. Although other recognizable characters should be analyzed, gang members comm single us e a different language, stylusisms, and dressing codes. The use of hand gestures, certain color dis diarrheas, and signs are typical of youth gangs. However, blame has been pegged on educators and school administrators for overlooking much(prenominal) actions. Teachers and administrators have no option when it comes to learning and acknowledging the key indicators of youth gangs in schools. More importantly, educators lack knowledge of the risk factors that drive the formation of youth gangs. Battin-Pearson, Guo, Hill, Abbott, Catalano, and Hawkins (1997) categorized the possible risk factors into the family, school, peer, club, and individual circumstances. Dysfunctional families bring disaffection in children, thereby providing a primary motivation to join a gang. When one is separated from the company, he or she may seek espousal in peer groups. These peer groups would then make joining a gang more appealing to the socially isolated young person. Therefore, exposing childre n to mixed risks increases the fortune that they may accede to forces of youth gangs.Problem StatementIt is seeming(a) that the explosion of youth gangs and gang-related force-out has continued to skyrocket since the late-1990s. Global records show that the United States harbors about 30,000 distinct youth gangs made up of not less than 800,000 members. It is believed that these figures may be higher because people have infirm information on what constitutes a gang. Incarceration of gang members and complicated well-grounded procedures are other justifications of the variations in the estimates. Per the most recent surveys, more comely estimates comprise of at least 20,000 respective gangs with over 1,000,000 associates. It is worth stating that the more these gangs spread throughout a country or region, the more waste their implications on public schools and learners become. The severity of effects of gangs in the contemporary society has exceeded historical levels. In othe r words, both the presence and activity of youth gangs in schools have raised concerns much(prenominal) as academic disruption, the gloaming in discipline among students, and increased cases of force play.The primary problem is that in most cases, teachers and school administrators fail to identify in time and mitigate gang problems in schools sufficiently. However, analysts do not blame educators and administrators entirely for their reluctance to recognize the presence and effects of gangs in school environments. In that essence, the contribution of public and political perceptions to their reluctance cannot be overlooked. On the contrary, the absence of official gang training in the pre- inspection and repair and in-service professional cultivation activities.Scholars have projected that when gang operations go unnoticed and unmitigated, such outcomes as increased gang activities, uncertain learning conditions, and ineffectiveness of campus security become more pervasive (Egl ey, Howell, Moore, 2010). The underlying issue is not just the recognition of key indicators and risks factors but the ability and capacity to recognize them in such a manner that facilitates mitigation and eradication of gangs from schools and the local communities. The situation may worsen in the near future if appropriate recognition methods and interventional measures are not employ as fast as necessary.Solution to Gang Related Problems in SchoolBefore addressing the possible solution to gang related problems, it is dogmatic to address some of the risk factors promoting gang violence in a school setting. Understanding the root cause of gang related violence is key to addressing the issue of youths and gangs in schools. Howell (2011) documented some of the factors likely to prom youth gangs in a school setting. These factors are classified into individual, family, and school related factors. The individual risk factors include alcohol and drug abuse, unsociable behaviour, vi ctimization, mental health problems, and negative life events. Howell (2011) contended that antisocial behaviour was one of the prim factors promoting youth and gang in schools.Howell asserts that children whose antisocial behaviour progressively worsens are more likely to join various gang groups. unsociable behaviour includes aggression, alcohol and drug use, early dating, and violence without a weapon. In adolescence, other forms of violence do emerge, including attacking someone with a weapon. Therefore, antisocial behaviour is one of the prime causes of youth gang violence in a school setting. This implies that campaign to address the issue of gang violence should be geared towards addressing the issue of antisocial behaviour in schools. other individual factor contributing to youth and gangs in school include alcohol and drug abuse. Many students who are drug addicts are more likely to join gang groups (Huizinga Lovegrove, 2009). According to Howell (2011), alcohol and dru g abuse are among the leading triggers of youth and gangs in schools. In fact, where drug involves marijuana, the probability of joining gang group is extremely high. Besides alcohol abuse, mental health also constitutes problem compelling an individual to join gangs in school.Despite little evidence on the position contend by mental health problems in promoting gang violence, research shows that mental problems among young people escalates their chances of joining a gang group in a school setting. These mental health problems encompass externalising behaviours, conduct dis distinguishs, depression, and hyperactivity (Howell Egley, 2005). The resume conducted by Davis and Flannery (2001) highlighted that gang members in juvenile correctional facilities are regularly admitted with histories of inner and physical abuse, psychiatric disturbances, substance abuse, cognitive deficits, and traumatic stress disorder among others. Therefore, effort to provide robust solutions to addres sing the issue of youths and gang in school should be geared towards addressing the above documented individual risk factors.Howell (2011) cited family risk factors as being answerable for compelling an individual to join a gang group in a school setting. Per Howell, parents play an tall(prenominal) employment in promoting positive child- knowledge right from birth. He pointed adversities, including multiple family transitions, single-parent household, financial stress, and poverty as potential risk factors, increasing the likelihood of one joining a criminal gang. The aforementioned factors weaken effective agnate supervision while disturbing proper development of stronger family bonds.In ability for parents to exercise proper parental control has been proven beyond commonsense doubt to promote children familiarity in gang in various school settings. Additionally, parents history of gang involvement also plays an important section in the childs criminal behaviour. Howell (20 11) posits that where a family member got involved in criminal behaviour or gang, the probability of his or her children joining gang is very(prenominal) high.School related factors have also been scrutinised to explore the role they play in promoting youth engagement in gang membership. However, it is interesting that study in this area have whole been enjoin towards examining the role played by a students academic achievement in gang involvement (Gottfredson et al., 2005). The study conducted by Thornberry, Krohn, et al., (2003) found that poor school performance on mathematics subject predicted male gang involvement. Based on this study, it is presumable that poor school performance played a role in youth gang involvement in a school setting.The biotic community risk factors have also been cited as a risk factor for youth involvement in gang violence. Pyrooz, Fox, and Decker (2010) opine that gangs always tend to cluster in economically disadvantaged and high-crime neighbou rhoods. Where gangs cluster in each neighbourhood, the probability of youths joining gang group is extremely high. Some of the community related risk factors compelling youths to join gangs include widespread use of drugs and firearms, a huge number of people involved in outlawed behaviours within the community, and increased alcohol and drug abuse.SolutionsWith respect to the rising rate of gang related violence, more so in a school setting, it is imperative to develop robust strategies to sufficiently address the issue of school youths joining gang groups. There are many strategies that can be implemented to address the issue as will be discussed in this section.Ineffective gun control strategies have been blamed to be responsible for the increased gang violence in a school setting. This implies that effort to reduce gang related violence should be geared towards implementing effective gun control policies to ensure that youths do not get penetration to guns. Research shows that drug abuse worsens juvenile violence in cardinal different ways. For instance, firearm is highly prevalent among drug addicts, something that increases the chances of possessing and illegally employ arms to engage in violence. Therefore, effort to reduce drug-gun related violence should be geared towards addressing the issue of drugs in community.To reduce an environment of fear and attain the highest reduction in number of youths carrying weapons, effort ought to be directed towards not only implementing effective gun control policies, but also conducting an operation to disarm the number of youths carrying the weapons. Youth involvement and community support planning and implementation are key to making the disarmament process effective.Community support programs geared towards promoting economic development is also a step in the right direction as far as solutions are concerned. In most cases, youths join gang groups because of poverty they are unable to access adequate food. They are, therefore, forced to resort to gang violence as a strategy of achieving the end, which is using illegal methods to earn money. Therefore, community efforts should involve integrating programs that promote economic growth and development within the community.Besides the above, another effective strategy is studying students displaying antisocial behaviors. Based on this research, such students were more likely to join the school gang group. In this regard, they must be warned that any attempt to promote youth-gun would be dealt with accordingly.In some cases, promoting economic growth and development may not be effective because youth crime has always been reported to be high even in cities with a robust history of economic development. In this case, teaching school going children on the need to vacate violence behavior and the consequences associated with participating in gang groups is likely to reduce the number of school youths considering joining gangs.Scholars have s uggested different strategies for mitigating the prevalence of different youth gang activities and gang-associated impacts on students. Among the most cited strategies include anti-gang education, anti-violence programs, school absenteeism and excision responses, positive pro-social behavior models, and inclusion. These strategies are useful in nurturing peaceful learning, coexistence, and social integration.Anti-youth gang education is a promising way of discouraging children and young crowings from acquiring youth gang membership. In some jurisdictions, gang vindication education and training programs have been integrated into the curriculum. The advocates of this program argue that it enables students to have perfect information concerning their respective schools and homesteads, thereby encouraging positive social behaviors. The mentioned program focuses primarily on emphasizing the negative effects of alcohol and drug abuse, while engaging the youth in community development programs. However, the implementation such a curriculum should be the responsibility of security officers because they are more familiar with conflict management, drugs, and criminal justice.Research shows that students who have successfully undergone an education and training programs portray more pro-social behaviors than other students. On the same note, well-trained police officers play pivotal roles in not only preventing the formation of youth gangs, but also in enforcing law and order in the community. Therefore, police presence in schools can boost educators and administrators morale in the fight against youth gangs.Anti-violence programs form another set of strategies for moderate the proliferation of gangs in learning institutions. This category of strategies consists of mentoring programs for young boys, anti-bullying campaigns, pro-diversity policies and practices, and selection of community data link officers. Psychologists believe that anti-bullying programs such a s reporting of bullying incidences make vulnerable students feel more secure and less likely to seek holiday resort in a gang. Per emotion experts, mentoring boys reduces violence against students having same conjure up relationships. Besides, racial-violence in schools can be reduced by creating and promoting race-free environments. As a payoff of fact, schools are encouraged to preach cultural diversity and equality so that distant students can gain a sense of belonging to a school community. In addition to the school community, connexion officers can also promote cultural diversity by ensuring that ethnic minority communities actively get in in youth education and well-being promotion.Additionally, curriculum reforms, creative activity of incentives for attendance, allowing re-entry of excluded and malcontent students, and the use of restorative justice in disciplining students are the chief(prenominal) ways of reducing cases of absenteeism and forcing out. Those who sup port curriculum change posit that learning should be more vocational and practical in the sense that flush hours and weekends are devoted to recreational and talent shows. Studies have established that most students find these sessions exciting and refreshing. Elsewhere, setting a class target with the observe of an jaunt has been found to potentially increase school attendance. Students can also be prepared to re-enter regular schools by taking them to resource schools such as rehabilitation centers. Most these alternative schools have provided community service training necessary for building self-esteem in young people. Fundamentally, there is a need to streamline the interaction between parents, educators, administrators, and security personnel. strong communication in social systems harbors myriad of achieving restorative justice. Scholars have identified youth conferences as the most effective communication enthrall when it comes to impacting behavior change in young peo ple.Nevertheless, other educationists have viewed the role of mentorship in preventing gang activity from another lens. The contribution of both bad and peer mentors towards behavior change has been seamlessly commendable. Adult mentors comprise of designated and proficient individuals who disco biscuit guidance, counseling, and assistance to young groups. School administrators and peer leaders can be more productive in addressing problems affecting young people such as appropriate dressing, appropriate verbiage, and understanding.Scholars have suggested different strategies for mitigating the prevalence of different youth gang activities and gang-associated impacts on students. Among the most cited strategies include anti-gang education, anti-violence programs, school absenteeism and exclusion responses, positive pro-social behavior models, and inclusion. These strategies are useful in nurturing peaceful learning, coexistence, and social integration.Anti-youth gang education is a promising way of discouraging children and young adults from acquiring youth gang membership. In some jurisdictions, gang metro education and training programs have been integrated into the curriculum. The advocates of this program argue that it enables students to have perfect information concerning their respective schools and homesteads, thereby encouraging positive social behaviors. The mentioned program focuses primarily on emphasizing the negative effects of alcohol and drug abuse, while engaging the youth in community development programs. However, the implementation such a curriculum should be the responsibility of security officers because they are more familiar with conflict management, drugs, and criminal justice.Research shows that students who have successfully undergone an education and training programs portray more pro-social behaviors than other students. On the same note, well-trained police officers play pivotal roles in not only preventing the formation of yout h gangs, but also in enforcing law and order in the community. Therefore, police presence in schools can boost educators and administrators morale in the fight against youth gangs.Anti-violence programs form another set of strategies for hold the proliferation of gangs in learning institutions. This category of strategies consists of mentoring programs for young boys, anti-bullying campaigns, pro-diversity policies and practices, and selection of community liaison officers. Psychologists believe that anti-bullying programs such as reporting of bullying incidences make vulnerable students feel more secure and less likely to seek base hitty in a gang. According to emotion experts, mentoring boys reduces violence against students having same sex relationships. Besides, racial-violence in schools can be reduced by creating and promoting race-free environments. In fact, schools are encouraged to preach cultural diversity and equality so that foreign students can gain a sense of belong ing to a school community. In addition to the school community, liaison officers can also promote cultural diversity by ensuring that ethnic minority communities actively participate in youth education and well-being promotion.Additionally, curriculum reforms, creation of incentives for attendance, allowing re-entry of excluded and disaffected students, and the use of restorative justice in disciplining students are the main ways of reducing cases of absenteeism and exclusion. Those who support curriculum change posit that learning should be more vocational and practical in the sense that evening hours and weekends are devoted to recreational and talent shows. Studies have established that most students find these sessions exciting and refreshing. Elsewhere, setting a class target with the reward of an excursion has been found to potentially increase school attendance. Students can also be prepared to re-enter regular schools by taking them to alternative schools such as rehabilitat ion centers. Most of these alternative schools have provided community service training necessary for building self-esteem in young people. Fundamentally, there is a need to streamline the interaction between parents, educators, administrators, and security personnel. Effective communication in social systems harbors a myriad of achieving restorative justice. Scholars have identified youth conferences as the most effective communication groove when it comes to impacting behavior change in young people.Nevertheless, other educationists have viewed the role of mentorship in preventing gang activity from another lens. The contribution of both adult and peer mentors towards behavior change has been seamlessly commendable. Adult mentors comprise of designated and proficient individuals who advance guidance, counseling, and assistance to young groups. School administrators and peer leaders can be more productive in addressing problems affecting young people such as appropriate dressing, appropriate verbiage, and understanding.References2010. Retrieved fromhttp//nces.ed.gov/programs/crimeindicators/crimeindicators2010/ind_08.asp.Battin-Pearson, S., Guo, J., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R., Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D. (1997). Early predictors of sustained adolescent gang membership. In American society of criminology annual meeting, San Diego, CA.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1991). Weapon-carrying among high school students United States, 1990. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 40(40), 681-684. Blumstein, 1994.Egley, A., Jr., Howell, J. C., Moore, J. P. (2010). Highlights of the 2008 topic youthEstrada, J. N., Astor, R. A., Benbenishty, R., Gilreath, T., De Pedro, K. (2011). Merging gang and school violence theoretical models examining predictors of gang membership within California schools. In American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA.Estrada, J. N., Gilreath, T. D., Astor, R. A., Benbenishty, R. (2013). Gang me mbership of California middle school students behaviors and attitudes as mediators of school violence. Health education research, cyt037.From http//www.k12.wa.us/LegisGov/2011documents/GangsTaskForceReport.pdf.gang survey. Retrieved from http//www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/229249.pdfHOME confidence (2011). Knife, gun and gang-related violence. online. Last accessed 25 April 2011 at http//www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime/knife-gun-gang-youth-violence/.Howell, J. C. (2007). Menacing or mimicking? Realities of youth gangs. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 58(2), 39-50.Howell, J. C. (2011). Gang prevention an overview of research and programs. DIANE Publishing.Mayer, M. J., Furlong, M. J. (2010). How safe are our schools? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 16-26.National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Indicators of school crime and safetyODonnell, C., Egley, A., Howell, J. C. (2009). Over a decade of national youth gangRetrieved from http//www.allacademic.com/meta/p373416_index.htm lSmith, T. G. (2011). Gangs in schools task force Report to the legislature. RetrievedSurvey research What have we learned? Paper presented at the annual meeting ofThe ASC, Annual Meeting, Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, Philadelphia, PA.