Compare the portrayal of Clytaemnestra in both Aeschylus Essay Example for Free

Compare the portrayal of Clytaemnestra in both Aeschylus EssayCompare the portrayal of Clytaemnestra in both Aeschylus Agamemnon and Euripides Electra. Which portrayal do you think is more utile and why?The function of Clytaemnestra is portrayed real differently in both Aeschylus Agamemnon and Euripides Electra. In Agamemnon, we clear a very strong female ruler, who is all in all absorbed by her vexation for vengeance, whereas the figure in Electra is far more maternal, and shows a concern for her family and reputation, which was non apparent in Aeschylus play. This suppress version of Clytaemnestra shows a stark contrast to the fierce and dominant character in Agamemnon, however both characters remain fascinating for different reasons. The Clytaemnestra of Agamemnon seems to be fearless of retri only whenion, with an infallible view in her own righteousness I have no fear that his avengers tread shall shake this house. In Electra, however, we see a very different charac ter, humbled over the years, and afraid of Orestes, Im terrifiedthey say he is teeming of anger for his fathers death. These different reactions to the same topic emphasise how greatly the character of Clytaemnestra differs in each play, from the small and subdued housewife of Electra, to the self-assured and confident impinge oness of Agamemnon.One explanation for the changes in character of Clytaemnestra in these plays is the durationscale in which they are set. The events in Electra happen some(prenominal) years after(prenominal) those in Agamemnon, and the more mature and calmer Clytaemnestra we see portrayed in Euripides play could be due to the effect of time on her, and the fact that she has had several years in which to reflect upon her actions and realise the full extent of the crimes that she committed against her husband. In Electra, Clytaemnestra states how bitterly I regret it now with regards to the murder she has committed, showing that she has indeed been think ing active the events of the past and repents her actions.This Clytaemnestra is very subdued in comparison to the character portrayed by Aeschylus, and although we can see some evidence of the passion and raw energy that made the character so fascinating in Agamemnon, for instance when she attempts to justify her murder of Agamemnon to her daughter why should he non die? it is clear in Electra that Clytaemnestra is to take second coiffe to her daughter in regards to unhindered fury and a lust for vengeance. This older, wiser Clytaemnestra still remains crucial to the plot, but not as a central character, and is merely a shadow of her former self, the confident, powerful pecker who dictated the action of Aeschylus play.The style of the two playwrights is a notable difference in the two plays, and the office of Clytaemnestra varies greatly due to this. Euripides, the more modern o the two tragedists, tended to use sophistic arguments to confound the audiences expectations of a ch aracter. With Clytaemnestra, for instance, he decided to move away from her monstrous image the audience would have expected after plays such as Agamemnon, and instead portrayed her as a gentler, maternal figure. This technique was enhanced by the fact that we do not see Clytaemnestra until the second half of the play only hear about her from Electra. The image portrayed by this character is similar to the one portrayed in Agamemnon, so a great deal so as the audience can wonder whether Euripides is intentionally parodying this version of events, as he had through earlier in the play with the recognition scene, a clear parody of The Libation Bearers. Aeschylus, a far more traditional playwright, portrays Clytaemnestra in her classic style, as the murderess of her own husband.This portrayal is, however, somewhat sympathetic towards Clytaemnestra, and we can come up some compassion towards her, although this does not excuse her actions. Aeschylus gave the audience a clear chaste st andpoint in his tragedies, and they are aware through both the use of the chorus, and the play itself, whose side to be on, from a moral perspective. Euripides on the other hand, tended to be deliberately ambiguous, and his treatment of Clytaemnestra is typical of this. The two sides of the woman that are opened in this play the ruthless killer of Agamemnon, as seen through the eyes of Electra, and the reformed wife of Aegisthus, as is later portrayed. This use of sophistic techniques in order to confound the audiences expectations is common in the plays of Euripides, and is particularly effective in this portrayal of such a fascinating woman.The fact that Clytaemnestra is the central character in Agamemnon further only plays a small part in Euripides Electra also accounts for several differences in her character. The Clytaemnestra in Agamemnon appears just about constantly throughout the play, and through this we can see the development of her character from the strong wife fee l after her husbands estate whilst he is at war Our king and leader absentour duty pays his due communion to his wife, to the violent mistress who murders her husband without remorse at the end of the play caught by the ruthless dissimulation of a wife. Aeschylus is able to develop his character over a far greater stretch of time than Euripides as, in Electra, Clytaemnestra only appears in one scene.The fact that Clytaemnestra is the main protagonist in Agamemnon allows us to get word her character to a far greater extent, enabling us to see how obsessed she has become with the image of vengeance, and the murder of her husband His death the work of my right hand, whose craftsmanship Justice acknowledges. In Electra, the character of Clytaemnestra is not given as much time to develop, and we have to make assumptions on her based on the brusk dialogue between her and Electra.